Post by BreakForNews on Aug 30, 2005 1:34:34 GMT
Here's a selection of the positive responses we have
had by email about our CIA Internet Fakes article:
www.breakfornews.com/TheCIAInternetFakes.htm
=========================================
Dear, dear Fintan
your 'CIA Fake' analysis is absolutely spot on. Bravo: You - and Kathy - deserve a media award, though of course that would indicate your selling out ala Bob Geldof, KBE. Watch this space: Bonio will be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize as soon as you can say G8 puppet, mark my words.
Keep going, get stronger; alienate yourself from these Muppets - stand alone. I always knew you were closing in on the fakers; call it male intuition (yes Kathy, us men get it too). Re: Alex 'tabloid' Jones: You would not believe the number of aquantances and fair-weather friends I have lost by trumpeting his tune. 'More harm than good he does, hmmm' (paraphrasing 'Yoda').
BTW, I gave up the pish, bread, eggs and milk; instantly came down with a horrible cold. You owe me one you, you...
Have had to get back on aforementioned addictions - I simply couldn't handle the cold turkey.
Godspeed. Stay healthy, weathy and wise.
Kind regards
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
Hi Kathy & Fintan,
Thanks for that clarification interview. Fintan, speaking for myself, I think sometimes you get too far ahead of the game and assume that others are also up to speed, though I’m sure many are. You know what they say when you assume, you make an ASS out of U and ME. If you could do this type of audio explanations on are more regular basis, it would help give those of us whose brain cells venture in other directions, a leg up.
Cheers
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
You certainly have something, Fintan, but backing your theories with fact is essential. Here's something to help you:
The Lincoln Group, psyops specialist, just linked forces with powerful lobbyist BKSH (headed by Charlie Black, ex-spokeman to Bush I, work in Iraq (Chalabi, INC), Iran (Radio Voice Iran), the EU, Yukos (Russian Oil Co) etc.)
Both specialise in control of the media, propaganda and especially the middle-east.
This comes from the Lincoln Group webiste under work undertaken examples:
"Video - National Security Forces"
"Our client faced tremendous identity and public confidence issues as they built up their internal capacity to defend and protect their citizens. Lincoln worked alongside the client to develop the film, graphics and narrative required to develop a truthful and compelling visual story of the emerging security forces."
and
"Competitive Internet Strategy"
"Our client faced a growing number of competitors who used web sites, BLOGs and other online tools to develop false and inflated stories which harmed the client's reputation. Our analysts and media experts developed recommendations to counter the online threat and continued to monitor the internet for new messages. Our development team developed a professional online resource which effectively conveyed our client's message and countered false rumors and stories posted by the competition."
That should strengthen your case.
All the Best.
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
Hello Fintan,
I've just been exploring your website and audio for the last several
days, having discovered it in the wake of the London bombings. Great
stuff, very intelligent and provocative, though I don't agree with all
of it.
I have a question in response to your point about CIA Internet Fakes.
Let's suppose that you're correct (your argument makes sense, though
it's not verifiable), and that "the CIA" planned the 9/11 truth movement
as part of the inevitable aftermath of 9/11.
Assuming this is the case, my question is:
To what extent would it have been necessary to actually employ a great
number of agents infiltrating (and/or creating) all these sites, books,
videos, etc., and to what extent could they have achieved the same
effect with much less effort, simply by running a much smaller number of
sites but by producing red herrings and "poking and prodding" the
mostly-grassroots 9/11 truth movement as necessary to keep it "in
line" (or divided, confused, etc.)?
Thus, the greater number of webmasters and researchers behind the sites
on your CIA Internet Fakes list are really, in a sense, unwitting
CIAgents -- "agents" manipulated by, and furthering the interests of,
the CIA (etc.) simply by following the (manipulated/controlled) trail of
evidence, news, statements, etc., wherever it leads (or is led).
If this is true, then your designation of these sites as "CIA Internet
Fakes" is misleading, and it's understandable why many people are misled
or put-off by the wide expanse of your list. I know you've tried to
clarify this somewhat, but by the title alone it's still misleading, and
I think you would do better to be more humble in your assertions (unless
you have evidence you're withholding), explicitly admitting a wide range
of possibilities for how the 9/11 truth movement might be operating
(e.g. from deliberately minimal CIA involvement -- just enough to keep
it in line, to divide and mislead people, and to dash any hopes which
naturally arise -- to maximal CIA control, planning, and execution -- as
your title suggests), rather than standing by your original (misleading)
assertion and refusing to back up your claims or deal with the minutiae
of who's who or just how this thing operates, not only in theory (which
holds water) but in practice (which, assuming a vast, tightly
controlled, carefully-planned operation, is nearly incredible and
perhaps unnecessary in scope to achieve the psyops you've identified).
Keep up the good work (including the reminder to get off our asses and
not rely on people like you to "keep up the good work").
Best regards,
Marc
=========================================
Hello and Greetings Fintan…
I have to say I was very impressed with your honest analysis on current
event s (The London 777 bombs) and I have also taken time to go over several
of your postings and articles. The reason why I say “impressed…” was that I
have been reading a lot of the postings (internet fakes) from the other
sites on and off for the past few years and they isn’t really been dropping
shit! but I have to say, you where the first white/Caucasian/Irish man to,
what I can only describe as “Stepping correctly” in other words spotting and
pointing out the very obvious fact that most of the G8 members are white and
people they shit on from a great height are of a Melanin Hue.
I observed them (G8) simply as white supremacy/racists flexing and doing
what they have always done pure and simple…these people are psychopaths in
the strictest sense, as in, they can blow up innocent people (some of there
own) and then come on International tell-lie-vision and blame it on …them
bad people with darker skin…And in the mean time the would be people (Mr and
Mrs Joe Public) imbibe there lies as facts.
Mmm tut-tut…I find it …the height of thoughtlessness and irresponsibility
not to look elsewhere for a second opinion, but of course that’s what they
(G8) are banking on ….that they (sheeple) can’t be bothered to check out the
lack of details and, examine ask questions just like most intelligent people
should and do and…well…I try tell as many people as possible about you site
as I can.
Or find your web site… but if the do come on the net the sheep type in
conspiracy and BAM ….instead find David icky and then or worse Prison
planet…I mean these people have a lot of info but its just that ten percent
of dishonesty mixed in that does the damage…Any way Fintan your pretty fly
for a white guy….lol keep up the good work..oh and I love your analysis on
the working of the Universe…So with that I will conclude that you have in
you the Universal synergistic code of Empathic cohesive harmonic, called
by some…LOVE
Hotep for now….
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
Kathy/Fintan... Yo,
Yeoman enterprise you're doing, for which the planetary birth of cosmic youth smiles, however infantilely... :-}
If you are correct in identification of Jeff Rense, in particular, as a CIA-gent, then you'll want to pay particular attention to the Thursday August 25th program. All three hours devoted to Greg Szymanki's *find* Janet Parker.
Her *story* is another of these *too good to be true* sorts. She knows all about John O'Neill -- EXCEPT what he thought after doing *forensics* at the OKC bombing, or any of his other investigations. Whoops. Otherwise, most of her *programming* held up reasonably well; she was at her best explaining why she had no need to know things and is very familiar with the lingo. I might even have been convinced -- although I have a long-held, intuitively conceived interpretation of that saga -- UNLESS I had grokked your exposé and results of your site-tracking activates. Way to go, Kathy.
If we start with the hypothesis, as a possibility, that Jeff is a *master mouthpiece* then the corollary of that would be that everything his guests say -- that is relevant to current events, at any rate -- is about diametrically opposite of truth and reality. Ergo, this latest *program* is calculated and significant.
In order to get it to fly at all, it has to contain a great deal of factually verifiable material about the subject. Uh-huh, but there wasn't much that isn't already in the public record. ]The tidbit I did savor, however, was that in NYC at the same of his *reign* (of terror?) there, "he had 350 agents under him." And THAT is quite the WORK FORCE, I'd say. Thank you Janet Parker.]
Her story is that she's a *veterinarian* -- and maybe she is -- who somehow, "because all veterinarians do it", she's *involved* in counter bio-weapons know-how. She's been a friend of O'Neill's for 25 years but, despite his rep as a womanizer, there's no *romantic* interest. She doesn't even know she's a source, or that he's high in the FBI. He's just great, although she can tell he's a bit of a smoothy, a *user*. Jeff and Greg never miss an opportunity to remind what a GREAT AMERICAN HERO he was. The latter, at the wrap-up, seems to ask some tough questions, but it's almost as if he's anticipated the answers and slides right over them with no *supplementary* follow-through.
My biggest realization is that the WHOLE story -- as a garment -- totally reinforces the *Al Qaeda did it* rationale for all that has transpired since. And that, in itself, just does not fly. I've heard JR convey that opinion, always gloomily, a hundred times.
The greatest goof, IMHO -- although it is slightly possibly a misspeak, but if so it was a repeated, uncorrected misspeak -- occurs in two parts: (a) in Szymanski's intro, he describes Janet as having played a role in O'Neill's attempt to clean up the fibbie office in CHICAGO (where, indeed, the record indicates he was stationed). However, near the end, she clearly reports him as having been *cleaning up corruption* in BOSTON. Hmmm...
S. says he was suspicious of the O'Neill story from the outset, and began collecting *a thousand pages* of research material, intending but never getting around to a further investigation; then this woman comes to him. Finally, HE has an explanation that works for him. It provides a new chance to regurgitate and reinforce the whole legend. *He was on the trail of the jackals and maybe could have thwarted them except for official interference.* *He knew too much, was squeezed out of the FBI, accepted the offer of Merv Bush's old position -- at the attractive salary of $300,000 per, as compared with his previous $100,000 (and he NEEDED money; John enjoyed the high life).*
Their joint position is that he was *entrapped* into *Building 7 -- where his office likely was because that was the nerve center of the Emergency Management Authority.*
*He was a loose canon, disgruntled despite the payoff (because he'd rather be out running agents), and a potential whistleblower. In fact, he WAS a whistleblower -- [Huh? Oh...] -- because he told his intelligence contacts in FRANCE when no one at home would listen to him [as he busily promulgated the *Usama is the enemy* mythology]. He was murdered/executed to silence him.* That's the gist of that.
Revealing is that: "He could be incognito, running around, and you would never know. He was a master of disguises." "He could disappear for a month and no one would miss him very much." "He loved children and pets." "We'll never know what really happened." "He had concerns about my [foster] daughter." "He used her as an agent despite my wishes that he wouldn't." "Clearly on the trail of this particular suspect and clearly being frustrated."
But what if, what if, what if -- if this DIS-info can be turned inside out -- an he was actually the brilliant and Draconian *author* of this provocation. What if, what if, what if he TRULY hated this once-insider group of Islamics who had knew inside-out (intelligence-wise) who were having to respond to the mass-wishes of their constituents. Or, even more Machiavellian, that this *clash of civilizations* scenario is simply the cover for a final attempt at global dominion?
He'd be just about the perfect point man. The legend would have to be very carefully laid so that, in the aftermath, he could disappear, become someone new, be declared dead and, hence, beyond all interrogation.
Something to think about?
Anyway, thanks again for the great work. I've had my suspicions about a few on your list: buzzflash, claokanddagger, counterpunch, jones, ruppert, blood, kaminski, larouche, rapoport, rumormill, skolnick, flocco, wingtvnuts, come to mind. Szymanski is somewhat new to me, but I recognized over half the names on your list. So that's been most helpful as I attempt to keep my own bearings while conducting my own independent historical analyses.
Yours gratefully,
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
=========================================
Fintan:
I noticed that Steve Quayle's site was missing from your list of "CIA Fakes." Maybe he deserves a category of his own. Every time he appears with Noory on Coast to Coast my roses grow three feet.
Also, the day before the big blackout in NYC a year or two ago, James McCanney posted an emergency notice about an imminent FEMA exercise. He gave no details. He simply said the exercise was a prelude to a martial law declaration. The emergency notice was gone the next day and McCanney never mentioned it again. McCanney is a notorious braggart with a history of forcing puzzle pieces together, so it seemed odd that he wasn't on his rooftop shouting "I told you so!" Instead, he claimed the blackout was the result of a secret Tesla experiment carried out by the U.S. government. I don't know what caused the blackout, but I don't believe the official explanation that it was triggered by a tree falling on a power line in Ohio. Just prior to the blackout, an unexpected line of severe thunderstorms did move through New York and sections of New England. Weather service radar and public reports also indicated a powerful electrical storm in the vicinity of the Niagara Falls power station. But that's beside the point. My point is: the timing of McCanney's emergency notice and the blackout, and the way it all fell through the cracks, is very strange. Was I living in an episode of The Twilight Zone, or did you notice too?
Best,
* Name Witheldby BFN*, TX
=========================================
Hello Fintan,
Found your site last night off Cryptome. At first I
was alittle taken aback. I have supplied Mike Rivero
material since before 911. And ya, Alex is a dip shit
in Austin. Although I have contacts there that have
had run ins with spooks. I have also had an
"interview" by the Secret Service back in 2003.
Not sure of your spin on most of the alt sites listed.
Except when I saw your partner's site and her
reference to the Celestine Prophecy and the Japanese
healing. You guys are real.
I work for the city of Houston. Out my window is the
Enron building as well as Halliburton/KBR down the
road. Irony! I don't belong here.
Anyway, getting some creepy vibes on this SR05 event
at Ft. Monroe. The head dude was canned today.
Something is up. Wondering if you could comment or
other readers have provided insight?
Sincerely,
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
CIA internet fakes ?!
You guys have a lot of courage. I have suspected many of these, but
others are a complete surprise to me. WOW !!!
Regarding the airamerica.com link. Were you referring to
airamericaradio.com??
I am also surprised that YOWUSA.com is not on your list. It certainly
is difficult to discern who you can trust.
* Name Witheldby BFN*
had by email about our CIA Internet Fakes article:
www.breakfornews.com/TheCIAInternetFakes.htm
=========================================
Dear, dear Fintan
your 'CIA Fake' analysis is absolutely spot on. Bravo: You - and Kathy - deserve a media award, though of course that would indicate your selling out ala Bob Geldof, KBE. Watch this space: Bonio will be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize as soon as you can say G8 puppet, mark my words.
Keep going, get stronger; alienate yourself from these Muppets - stand alone. I always knew you were closing in on the fakers; call it male intuition (yes Kathy, us men get it too). Re: Alex 'tabloid' Jones: You would not believe the number of aquantances and fair-weather friends I have lost by trumpeting his tune. 'More harm than good he does, hmmm' (paraphrasing 'Yoda').
BTW, I gave up the pish, bread, eggs and milk; instantly came down with a horrible cold. You owe me one you, you...
Have had to get back on aforementioned addictions - I simply couldn't handle the cold turkey.
Godspeed. Stay healthy, weathy and wise.
Kind regards
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
Hi Kathy & Fintan,
Thanks for that clarification interview. Fintan, speaking for myself, I think sometimes you get too far ahead of the game and assume that others are also up to speed, though I’m sure many are. You know what they say when you assume, you make an ASS out of U and ME. If you could do this type of audio explanations on are more regular basis, it would help give those of us whose brain cells venture in other directions, a leg up.
Cheers
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
You certainly have something, Fintan, but backing your theories with fact is essential. Here's something to help you:
The Lincoln Group, psyops specialist, just linked forces with powerful lobbyist BKSH (headed by Charlie Black, ex-spokeman to Bush I, work in Iraq (Chalabi, INC), Iran (Radio Voice Iran), the EU, Yukos (Russian Oil Co) etc.)
Both specialise in control of the media, propaganda and especially the middle-east.
This comes from the Lincoln Group webiste under work undertaken examples:
"Video - National Security Forces"
"Our client faced tremendous identity and public confidence issues as they built up their internal capacity to defend and protect their citizens. Lincoln worked alongside the client to develop the film, graphics and narrative required to develop a truthful and compelling visual story of the emerging security forces."
and
"Competitive Internet Strategy"
"Our client faced a growing number of competitors who used web sites, BLOGs and other online tools to develop false and inflated stories which harmed the client's reputation. Our analysts and media experts developed recommendations to counter the online threat and continued to monitor the internet for new messages. Our development team developed a professional online resource which effectively conveyed our client's message and countered false rumors and stories posted by the competition."
That should strengthen your case.
All the Best.
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
Hello Fintan,
I've just been exploring your website and audio for the last several
days, having discovered it in the wake of the London bombings. Great
stuff, very intelligent and provocative, though I don't agree with all
of it.
I have a question in response to your point about CIA Internet Fakes.
Let's suppose that you're correct (your argument makes sense, though
it's not verifiable), and that "the CIA" planned the 9/11 truth movement
as part of the inevitable aftermath of 9/11.
Assuming this is the case, my question is:
To what extent would it have been necessary to actually employ a great
number of agents infiltrating (and/or creating) all these sites, books,
videos, etc., and to what extent could they have achieved the same
effect with much less effort, simply by running a much smaller number of
sites but by producing red herrings and "poking and prodding" the
mostly-grassroots 9/11 truth movement as necessary to keep it "in
line" (or divided, confused, etc.)?
Thus, the greater number of webmasters and researchers behind the sites
on your CIA Internet Fakes list are really, in a sense, unwitting
CIAgents -- "agents" manipulated by, and furthering the interests of,
the CIA (etc.) simply by following the (manipulated/controlled) trail of
evidence, news, statements, etc., wherever it leads (or is led).
If this is true, then your designation of these sites as "CIA Internet
Fakes" is misleading, and it's understandable why many people are misled
or put-off by the wide expanse of your list. I know you've tried to
clarify this somewhat, but by the title alone it's still misleading, and
I think you would do better to be more humble in your assertions (unless
you have evidence you're withholding), explicitly admitting a wide range
of possibilities for how the 9/11 truth movement might be operating
(e.g. from deliberately minimal CIA involvement -- just enough to keep
it in line, to divide and mislead people, and to dash any hopes which
naturally arise -- to maximal CIA control, planning, and execution -- as
your title suggests), rather than standing by your original (misleading)
assertion and refusing to back up your claims or deal with the minutiae
of who's who or just how this thing operates, not only in theory (which
holds water) but in practice (which, assuming a vast, tightly
controlled, carefully-planned operation, is nearly incredible and
perhaps unnecessary in scope to achieve the psyops you've identified).
Keep up the good work (including the reminder to get off our asses and
not rely on people like you to "keep up the good work").
Best regards,
Marc
=========================================
Hello and Greetings Fintan…
I have to say I was very impressed with your honest analysis on current
event s (The London 777 bombs) and I have also taken time to go over several
of your postings and articles. The reason why I say “impressed…” was that I
have been reading a lot of the postings (internet fakes) from the other
sites on and off for the past few years and they isn’t really been dropping
shit! but I have to say, you where the first white/Caucasian/Irish man to,
what I can only describe as “Stepping correctly” in other words spotting and
pointing out the very obvious fact that most of the G8 members are white and
people they shit on from a great height are of a Melanin Hue.
I observed them (G8) simply as white supremacy/racists flexing and doing
what they have always done pure and simple…these people are psychopaths in
the strictest sense, as in, they can blow up innocent people (some of there
own) and then come on International tell-lie-vision and blame it on …them
bad people with darker skin…And in the mean time the would be people (Mr and
Mrs Joe Public) imbibe there lies as facts.
Mmm tut-tut…I find it …the height of thoughtlessness and irresponsibility
not to look elsewhere for a second opinion, but of course that’s what they
(G8) are banking on ….that they (sheeple) can’t be bothered to check out the
lack of details and, examine ask questions just like most intelligent people
should and do and…well…I try tell as many people as possible about you site
as I can.
Or find your web site… but if the do come on the net the sheep type in
conspiracy and BAM ….instead find David icky and then or worse Prison
planet…I mean these people have a lot of info but its just that ten percent
of dishonesty mixed in that does the damage…Any way Fintan your pretty fly
for a white guy….lol keep up the good work..oh and I love your analysis on
the working of the Universe…So with that I will conclude that you have in
you the Universal synergistic code of Empathic cohesive harmonic, called
by some…LOVE
Hotep for now….
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
Kathy/Fintan... Yo,
Yeoman enterprise you're doing, for which the planetary birth of cosmic youth smiles, however infantilely... :-}
If you are correct in identification of Jeff Rense, in particular, as a CIA-gent, then you'll want to pay particular attention to the Thursday August 25th program. All three hours devoted to Greg Szymanki's *find* Janet Parker.
Her *story* is another of these *too good to be true* sorts. She knows all about John O'Neill -- EXCEPT what he thought after doing *forensics* at the OKC bombing, or any of his other investigations. Whoops. Otherwise, most of her *programming* held up reasonably well; she was at her best explaining why she had no need to know things and is very familiar with the lingo. I might even have been convinced -- although I have a long-held, intuitively conceived interpretation of that saga -- UNLESS I had grokked your exposé and results of your site-tracking activates. Way to go, Kathy.
If we start with the hypothesis, as a possibility, that Jeff is a *master mouthpiece* then the corollary of that would be that everything his guests say -- that is relevant to current events, at any rate -- is about diametrically opposite of truth and reality. Ergo, this latest *program* is calculated and significant.
In order to get it to fly at all, it has to contain a great deal of factually verifiable material about the subject. Uh-huh, but there wasn't much that isn't already in the public record. ]The tidbit I did savor, however, was that in NYC at the same of his *reign* (of terror?) there, "he had 350 agents under him." And THAT is quite the WORK FORCE, I'd say. Thank you Janet Parker.]
Her story is that she's a *veterinarian* -- and maybe she is -- who somehow, "because all veterinarians do it", she's *involved* in counter bio-weapons know-how. She's been a friend of O'Neill's for 25 years but, despite his rep as a womanizer, there's no *romantic* interest. She doesn't even know she's a source, or that he's high in the FBI. He's just great, although she can tell he's a bit of a smoothy, a *user*. Jeff and Greg never miss an opportunity to remind what a GREAT AMERICAN HERO he was. The latter, at the wrap-up, seems to ask some tough questions, but it's almost as if he's anticipated the answers and slides right over them with no *supplementary* follow-through.
My biggest realization is that the WHOLE story -- as a garment -- totally reinforces the *Al Qaeda did it* rationale for all that has transpired since. And that, in itself, just does not fly. I've heard JR convey that opinion, always gloomily, a hundred times.
The greatest goof, IMHO -- although it is slightly possibly a misspeak, but if so it was a repeated, uncorrected misspeak -- occurs in two parts: (a) in Szymanski's intro, he describes Janet as having played a role in O'Neill's attempt to clean up the fibbie office in CHICAGO (where, indeed, the record indicates he was stationed). However, near the end, she clearly reports him as having been *cleaning up corruption* in BOSTON. Hmmm...
S. says he was suspicious of the O'Neill story from the outset, and began collecting *a thousand pages* of research material, intending but never getting around to a further investigation; then this woman comes to him. Finally, HE has an explanation that works for him. It provides a new chance to regurgitate and reinforce the whole legend. *He was on the trail of the jackals and maybe could have thwarted them except for official interference.* *He knew too much, was squeezed out of the FBI, accepted the offer of Merv Bush's old position -- at the attractive salary of $300,000 per, as compared with his previous $100,000 (and he NEEDED money; John enjoyed the high life).*
Their joint position is that he was *entrapped* into *Building 7 -- where his office likely was because that was the nerve center of the Emergency Management Authority.*
*He was a loose canon, disgruntled despite the payoff (because he'd rather be out running agents), and a potential whistleblower. In fact, he WAS a whistleblower -- [Huh? Oh...] -- because he told his intelligence contacts in FRANCE when no one at home would listen to him [as he busily promulgated the *Usama is the enemy* mythology]. He was murdered/executed to silence him.* That's the gist of that.
Revealing is that: "He could be incognito, running around, and you would never know. He was a master of disguises." "He could disappear for a month and no one would miss him very much." "He loved children and pets." "We'll never know what really happened." "He had concerns about my [foster] daughter." "He used her as an agent despite my wishes that he wouldn't." "Clearly on the trail of this particular suspect and clearly being frustrated."
But what if, what if, what if -- if this DIS-info can be turned inside out -- an he was actually the brilliant and Draconian *author* of this provocation. What if, what if, what if he TRULY hated this once-insider group of Islamics who had knew inside-out (intelligence-wise) who were having to respond to the mass-wishes of their constituents. Or, even more Machiavellian, that this *clash of civilizations* scenario is simply the cover for a final attempt at global dominion?
He'd be just about the perfect point man. The legend would have to be very carefully laid so that, in the aftermath, he could disappear, become someone new, be declared dead and, hence, beyond all interrogation.
Something to think about?
Anyway, thanks again for the great work. I've had my suspicions about a few on your list: buzzflash, claokanddagger, counterpunch, jones, ruppert, blood, kaminski, larouche, rapoport, rumormill, skolnick, flocco, wingtvnuts, come to mind. Szymanski is somewhat new to me, but I recognized over half the names on your list. So that's been most helpful as I attempt to keep my own bearings while conducting my own independent historical analyses.
Yours gratefully,
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
=========================================
Fintan:
I noticed that Steve Quayle's site was missing from your list of "CIA Fakes." Maybe he deserves a category of his own. Every time he appears with Noory on Coast to Coast my roses grow three feet.
Also, the day before the big blackout in NYC a year or two ago, James McCanney posted an emergency notice about an imminent FEMA exercise. He gave no details. He simply said the exercise was a prelude to a martial law declaration. The emergency notice was gone the next day and McCanney never mentioned it again. McCanney is a notorious braggart with a history of forcing puzzle pieces together, so it seemed odd that he wasn't on his rooftop shouting "I told you so!" Instead, he claimed the blackout was the result of a secret Tesla experiment carried out by the U.S. government. I don't know what caused the blackout, but I don't believe the official explanation that it was triggered by a tree falling on a power line in Ohio. Just prior to the blackout, an unexpected line of severe thunderstorms did move through New York and sections of New England. Weather service radar and public reports also indicated a powerful electrical storm in the vicinity of the Niagara Falls power station. But that's beside the point. My point is: the timing of McCanney's emergency notice and the blackout, and the way it all fell through the cracks, is very strange. Was I living in an episode of The Twilight Zone, or did you notice too?
Best,
* Name Witheldby BFN*, TX
=========================================
Hello Fintan,
Found your site last night off Cryptome. At first I
was alittle taken aback. I have supplied Mike Rivero
material since before 911. And ya, Alex is a dip shit
in Austin. Although I have contacts there that have
had run ins with spooks. I have also had an
"interview" by the Secret Service back in 2003.
Not sure of your spin on most of the alt sites listed.
Except when I saw your partner's site and her
reference to the Celestine Prophecy and the Japanese
healing. You guys are real.
I work for the city of Houston. Out my window is the
Enron building as well as Halliburton/KBR down the
road. Irony! I don't belong here.
Anyway, getting some creepy vibes on this SR05 event
at Ft. Monroe. The head dude was canned today.
Something is up. Wondering if you could comment or
other readers have provided insight?
Sincerely,
* Name Witheldby BFN*
=========================================
CIA internet fakes ?!
You guys have a lot of courage. I have suspected many of these, but
others are a complete surprise to me. WOW !!!
Regarding the airamerica.com link. Were you referring to
airamericaradio.com??
I am also surprised that YOWUSA.com is not on your list. It certainly
is difficult to discern who you can trust.
* Name Witheldby BFN*
