Post by BreakForNews on Aug 23, 2005 21:11:23 GMT
Read: Was 'Mormon Law' Rave Bust A PsyOp?
wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/08/was-mormon-law-rave-bust-psyop.html
The Salt Lake Tribune ran two articles on the raid:
Police raid rave party in Spanish Fork Canyon
www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2961967
Ravers say cops were too rough making bust
www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2964938
I wrote to the author of the articles, Michael N. Westley
saying that his first article was just police propaganda.
His Repy:
Dear Fintan:
I might ask if you've read ALL of The Tribune's coverage?
Or did you, like most others, decide to spout off with anger after reading the DAY 1 story, which, as a professional journalist this accustomed to working with daily deadlines and Sunday limitations, can understand.
Or perhaps not?
In either regard, thank you for reading.
And keep reading!! More good things to come?
Michael N. Westley
My Response:
Michael,
Let me give you credit for your follow-up article. Well done.
But your first piece was one "Gilbert said" after another
-without a single caveat.
Even one "Gilbert claimed" and I wouldn't have got riled.
Especially as you reported:
"Investigators learned that no permit had been requested for a mass gathering
which requires a bond and Utah County Commission approval for groups larger
than 250, said Gilbert.
Yes, Utah County Ordinance prohibits the assembly of more than 250 people
without a permit. But the additional permit seems only to be required for events
lasting "for twelve or more consecutive hours". [pdf Section 13-4-2-1] <--Hope you cover this!
www.utahcountyonline.com/apps/WebLink/Dept/ATTY/Chap13.pdf
You had an opportunity to close with at least some caution, but instead we got:
"Police want parents of teenagers to know the dangers of illegal, clandestine rave parties.
Gilbert said that in addition to heavy drug use, raves attract sexual assaults, violence,
theft and promote unsafe driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol."
Which was a propaganda statement on behalf of the police department.
As was the whole article, in fairness.
I suppose you don't write the headlines, but you piece was entitled:
"Ravers say cops were too rough making bust"
Woops, that's not what ravers said.
"Ravers say cops were brutal thugs making bust"
Now that would have been more like it!
regards
Fintan Dunne
His Latest Reply:
To be honest with you, on Sunday we had no idea how big this was going to become. Initally I had imagined writing a small brief on the bust and calling it good.
By the time we realized it was getting bigger, it was almost 10 p.m., about an hour from deadline. We swapped placement of the story with another and moved it to the section front and pulled more details, mostly narrative from the poilce press release.
It was not the only story I was working that night. And that's how it played out.
So what happened is that by Monday morning, when my account hit the stands, another 12 hours had passed in which many new developments had taken place.
The first day story is often not a whole picture. But no good story is told in just one day.