Post by BreakForNews on Aug 21, 2005 22:08:45 GMT
This just in by email from John Doraemi -Fintan
"Groups 1-3 believe any old rubbish(PeakOil, Bird Flu,
GannonGate). Clearly, that fourth group are the big
problem for the opinion massagers."
This Fintan person talks so much nuts, about nearly
everyone trying to get to the truth. But where are
his credentials?
There are actual "bird flu" problems out there,
spreading across Asia as we speak. Killing thousands
of birds, and the strain of flu is very similar to a
human form of the virus that kills 50% of victims.
That's not "rubbish," and it has nothing whatsoever to
do with one's opinion about September 11th.
"Peak Oil" is another concept that Fintan either
doesn't understand, or he thinks he can feel superior
by denigrating others. Hubbard was the scientist who
modelled how oil fields "peak" and decline. This is
an inevitability, if you keep pumping oil out of them.
(Hubbard predicted the peak/decline of US oilfields
to within a decade). On a global scale it will wreak
havoc unseen before, because of our irrational
overreliance on oil. The price will skyrocket into
the hudreds of dollars per barrel. This will affect
economies everywhere. Not "rubbish."
What passes for "fact" on Fintan's site? MOVIE PLOTS!
I was investigating how Fintan allegedly had the goods
on Daniel Hopsicker and Amanda Keller. There is
nothing in that entire article, except several old
movie reviews, to substantiate his claims. Nothing!
The man is a charlatan, and he's actively denigrating
nearly EVERYONE out there investigating 9-11.
Sorry, Fin, I'd take the word of Mike Ruppert over you
any day of the week. Same goes for Hopsicker,
Chossudovsky, and many of the others you are
attempting to demonize. Who's really not working for
"the truth" here?
What factual analysis do you offer to counter the
highly plausible claims made by these giants in the
field? Where's your fount of wisdom? (Old Arnold
movies don't count.)
John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State at:
crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/
"Groups 1-3 believe any old rubbish(PeakOil, Bird Flu,
GannonGate). Clearly, that fourth group are the big
problem for the opinion massagers."
This Fintan person talks so much nuts, about nearly
everyone trying to get to the truth. But where are
his credentials?
There are actual "bird flu" problems out there,
spreading across Asia as we speak. Killing thousands
of birds, and the strain of flu is very similar to a
human form of the virus that kills 50% of victims.
That's not "rubbish," and it has nothing whatsoever to
do with one's opinion about September 11th.
"Peak Oil" is another concept that Fintan either
doesn't understand, or he thinks he can feel superior
by denigrating others. Hubbard was the scientist who
modelled how oil fields "peak" and decline. This is
an inevitability, if you keep pumping oil out of them.
(Hubbard predicted the peak/decline of US oilfields
to within a decade). On a global scale it will wreak
havoc unseen before, because of our irrational
overreliance on oil. The price will skyrocket into
the hudreds of dollars per barrel. This will affect
economies everywhere. Not "rubbish."
What passes for "fact" on Fintan's site? MOVIE PLOTS!
I was investigating how Fintan allegedly had the goods
on Daniel Hopsicker and Amanda Keller. There is
nothing in that entire article, except several old
movie reviews, to substantiate his claims. Nothing!
The man is a charlatan, and he's actively denigrating
nearly EVERYONE out there investigating 9-11.
Sorry, Fin, I'd take the word of Mike Ruppert over you
any day of the week. Same goes for Hopsicker,
Chossudovsky, and many of the others you are
attempting to demonize. Who's really not working for
"the truth" here?
What factual analysis do you offer to counter the
highly plausible claims made by these giants in the
field? Where's your fount of wisdom? (Old Arnold
movies don't count.)
John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State at:
crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/